This year’s Olympic sponsors have taken an alternative approach to promoting their brand. They are no longer trying to push their products to the market through mass marketing. Instead, they are focusing on the parents of the athletes, the people at home, and the Olympic fans. This shows an increased level of engagement with the fans and target consumers. It makes the whole experience a lot more personal and touches on the consumer’s emotions, humour, and their own experiences with their children or parents.

Procter and Gamble currently have a ‘Thank you, Mom’ campaign which shows the athlete’s childhood and how their mother was the force behind them encouraging them each step of the way. The campaign focuses on the life of the athlete rather than the sporting excellence of the athlete. It means that the consumer feels as though they can relate to the athlete, whilst also being emotionally connected to the campaign. 

A less likely sponsor to take this approach is McDonald’s. Their most recent Olympic campaign focuses on the fans of the Olympic Games. The campaign consists of portrait photographs of the different types of fans, such as ‘the come-on come-on-er’. These portrait photographs will be made up of the McDonald’s customers, employees, and some of the British farmers that supply ingredients to the restaurant.

The campaign is going to record, replay, and celebrate the people, the moments, and emotions that will make the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games an exciting and engaging event worldwide.

Is this the way forward for these large companies? Is this their long-term marketing strategy for the future, or are they playing on the emotions of the consumer in order to personalise their brand? Something tells me it is probably the latter.